What’s of higher attention (at least to me) is that the NFL’s popular “after further review” program, which was excessive in its perception and execution, unsuccessful presently it was required most. Anyone who viewed the Falcons-Broncos activity of the past Thursday evening understood that the on area authorities were so cowed by the establishing that they were terrified to contact anything, but replay and there were a number of replays that evening — was there to set the history immediately.
One Thursday later, replay can't identify a Natural Bay interception from a Dallas party, and somehow the landing was standing. The former ref Gerry Austin, tx, that is now an ESPN specialist, said that replay cannot be used to figure out ownership. To which we say: Huh?
So the contact on the area er, one of the phone calls on the area was permitted to take a place, and now everybody is in a dither because the Excellent United states Game has been besmirched, but really: Who can't see this coming? In 7 days 1 the alternatives refs provided the Seahawks (yep, them again) a timeout they did not have as they were struggling to ranking the successful landing. That period they unsuccessful. 7 days 2 was way more intense. 7 days 3 was so bad — how was the Ravens’ successful area objective not reviewed? as to create you chuckle out noisy.
Surely Mark Goodell will climb up down from his violence pulpit and confess what everybody else sees: That the actual refs are required, that to proceed with these out of their level alternatives is to danger invalidating the frequent period. But the actual secret is why Goodell, who statements his daily objective is to “protect the [NFL logo] shield” could have let factors decline to this absurd excessive.
Ah, well. Maybe we can use replay to evaluation the commissioner’s approach. That is supposing he had one. That is also supposing replay can be invoked in situations of widespread absurdity, which I seriously question.